Better Book Videos
Latest videos by dsgamecube
 |
Re: Mac vs. PC Windows 7 vs. Mac Ad: Broken Promises Posted by: dsgamecube
Video duration: 140 seconds Video Cam Direct Upload Related: mac and pc broken promises, windows 7 vs mac Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Better Book videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: Randomkaoz. on 12 Apr 10, 03:33:56
No homie, people went back to XP because vista was a resource hog and had more problems then it should had. Yes it was fancy and looked amazing but sucked balls in any avg pc. Sound like a mac user? been building windows base pcs for 13 years now. Talking about research i had to school you on the whole PC1 vs PC2, had to explain why macs are not over priced and remind you that Centrino was a processor, maybe you need to stop buying cheap ass pcs? and claiming to know shit about them.
By: dsgamecube. on 11 Apr 10, 23:37:42
People were going back to XP because? they didn't want to buy new hardware even though it had been 6 years. I got a Vista machine at launch and couldn't be happier. If you are going to make statements, research them first if they are objective, otherwise you sound like a Mac user.
By: Randomkaoz. on 11 Apr 10, 23:30:42
obviously i wasn't talking about the 980x last time i checked about the 6 core chip they were going to name it the i9. They can call it low-end but by? now how many times are you going to use that. So hence trying to pass it off as a high-end because their in laptops. Oh yeah vista was the best sure... no it was the best ever made that's why everyone was going back to XP with a heart beat before windows 7 was even thought of. Stop reading the labels on things please.
By: Randomkaoz. on 11 Apr 10, 23:27:03
obviously i wasn't talking about the 980x last time i? heard of the 6 core processor it was going to be called the i9.
By: dsgamecube. on 11 Apr 10, 23:04:03
The i7 980X is a 6-core chip. Intel isn't going to call their processor a POS, but they? can still call it low-end, inexpensive, economical, etc. Vista was the best OS until 7 came out.
By: Randomkaoz. on 11 Apr 10, 21:12:45
No being slightly off is saying something like well the i7 is a 6 core chip, when its? a 4 core chip. Saying that the Centrino isn't a processor is being completely wrong. Like saying the sky is always silver. Centrino like the Celron is a low-end low budget processor nothing more. Just because intel is saying its a high-end doesn't make it so. Microsoft claimed that windows vista was going to be the best OS ever. Of course intel wouldn't say here buy this piece of shit we made.
By: dsgamecube. on 11 Apr 10, 19:17:03
"speak for yourself"? does not apply to facts.I was slightly off, Centrino 2 is a processor standard, not a package deal standard, and it is high-end. intel(dot)com/products/centrino/
By: Randomkaoz. on 09 Apr 10, 13:54:15
lol speak for yourself my man, Centrino 2 is a processor. It's a low budget processor like the i3 is for that family 1136 chip set. Just? like the celron was for the 487 and 775. PC1 is faster then PC2, just goes to show you that you don't know as much as you think you do. Its ok, you don't have to try and science it. You just so the pretty numbers and guessed that PC2 would be more powerful. So now i understand why you think macs are expensive vs a ATX brand name machine.
By: dsgamecube. on 09 Apr 10, 03:20:44
So long as both computers are functional, PC 2 is inherently faster. You cannot, with a compatible motherboard, bottleneck PC 2 to the point where it is slower than PC 1, and the possible difference? in PSUs is negligible because of the tiny price difference. If one or both computers is inoperable, the point is moot anyway. Besides, I'm still wondering whether I want to debate PCs with someone who thinks Centrino 2 is a processor.
By: Randomkaoz. on 09 Apr 10, 02:03:52
I don't use Snow leopard, i use old OSX and windows a mod 64bit XP which allows me to run most windows vista features without the BS. Aero peek and snap?? come on man, next thing your gonna tell me is the usefulness have having aero shake and the 3d cube. The only feature i'm interested in 7 is the improvement in hardware access vs? vista. Which is a SP firmware, nothing else. That's like when micro made windows 2000 then XP like if it was completely different, like 95 to 98
By: Randomkaoz. on 09 Apr 10, 01:59:45
and? this is where you knowledge and argument meet their end. You see, your wrong, PC1 is more powerful then PC2. Reason, because i didn't list the true facts of either pc. You just looked at the tech and the pretty numbers the through at you. If you was knowledgeable you would have asked that i gave more detail for each part. That's how Dell, HP etc... make if off to seem better then Mac for the same price making you think your getting more.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 21:06:21
Windows 7 adds quite a lot of features, unlike your precious Snow Leopard; Superbar, Aero Peek/Snap, and improves RAM? and processor usage among one or many cores.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 20:55:18
I think it is likely quite nice after the learning curve, but it is kind of? annoying meanwhile.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 20:54:30
Of course PC 2, with 2008 specs, was faster than PC 1, with 2003 specs. And let's look at PC 5: Core i7 X4 2.8GHz, 640GB HDD, GeForce GT 220, 8GB DDR3-1333. That? is double the amount of faster RAM, bigger HDD, slightly lower clock but double the cores, and a much better GPU (vs a chipste) compared to the iMac, at the same price (technically, I guess it's $1,199.99 vs. $1,199.00, but I'd definitely pay an extra dollar + tax.)
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 20:48:14
Centrino 2 is not a processor, it is a set for laptops consisting of a Core 2 Duo, a Draft-N card, and a 4500MHD. Core i is always better than Core 2 at the same clock speed. The i3 is? the only dual-core left in the lineup. There are i3 X2, i5 X4, and i7 X4 and X6. That is simply more cores than the old Core 2 Solo, Duo, Quad lineup.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 20:44:31
@Randomkaoz A. Centrino 2 is not a processor, it was a package for laptops. To be classified C2, a laptop had to have a certain Intel chipset, processor and wireless card; I believe it was Core 2 Duo, Draft-N, and 4500MHD. The i3 is the equivalent of the Core 2 Solo, it is the lowest-end processor. However, instead of the old Core 2 Solo X1, Duo X2, Quad X4, now there are the Core? i3 X2, i5 X4, and i7 X6. The i3 is an improved C2D, the i5 is an improved C2Q, and the i7 is new, but Core i>Core 2.
By: Randomkaoz. on 07 Apr 10, 20:20:48
god i hate this new youtube interface.?
By: Randomkaoz. on 07 Apr 10, 20:19:33
i3 is not a better processor vs a Core 2. A i5 is but not an i3, i3's are the Centrino 2 of the "i" core family. Core 2 duo price is higher then a i3 and like i said earlier to answer my point which? one of the computers that i listed was more powerful computer 1 or 2? I have a point to this and it will show you why the mac is really not that much more and is the same speed if not a little bit faster then your PC3. Also type i3 vs core 2 duo, toms hardware should pop up and you'll see
By: Randomkaoz. on 07 Apr 10, 20:17:02
i3 is not a better processor vs a Core 2. A i5 is but not an i3, i3's are the Centrino 2 of the "i" core family. Core 2 duo price is higher then a i3 and like i said earlier to answer my point which one of the computers that i listed was more powerful computer 1 or 2? I have a point to this and it will show you why the mac is really? not that much more and is the same speed if not a little bit faster then your PC3.
By: Randomkaoz. on 07 Apr 10, 20:08:12
But you? missed my whole point, man. Your looking at it has a consumer who looking to save money and not really looking deep into the systems themselves. Macs don't cost more hard ware wise, their cheaper. Its how they build them and the fact that they give you one 24 hours of ordering it. Its not free delivery your pay for that. You pay for the material that the computer is made from. You pay for their software that's already in the price.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 15:52:59
Actually, I have used the following: Belonging to my mother, age 4: iMac G3 pink. Belonging to friends: iBook G3, white PowerBook G3, silver PowerBook G4, silver iMac G5, white MacBook, silver MacBook Pro, silver MacBook, white as you can see, I have used numerous Macs, all with problems (beach ball? of death, CD drive refusing to eject [too bad there's no manual override] etc.)
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 15:48:33
sorry, I had the above post yesterday, but YouTube kept saying "error, try again." Look at the very top? of the page.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 15:47:28
sorry, YouTube kept? shooting me an error.
By: dsgamecube. on 07 Apr 10, 15:46:57
@randomkaoz PC 3 has Core i3 3.06 GHz, 4GB DDR3-1333, 640GB HDD, 21.5" 1080p monitor PC 4 has Core 2 Duo 3.06 GHz, 4GB DDR3-1066, 500GB HDD, 21.5" 1080p monitor PC 3 costs $800 PC 4 costs $1200 PC 4 is a Mac The only differences are that PC 3 has faster RAM (1333MHz v. 1066? MHz), a better processor architecture, (Core i v. Core 2), and a bigger HDD (640GB v. 500GB) while PC 4 has a glowing Apple logo. I will not pay $400 for my computer to have fruit stamped on it, will you?
By: Randomkaoz. on 07 Apr 10, 13:49:46
still? waiting for your response there buddy.