Better Book Videos
Better Book Titles video compilations - Page 28
![]() |
Noah's Ark-God, Giraffes & Genocide Posted by: TheThinkingAtheist
Video duration: 393 seconds Global video hits: 373108 Yes...the childhood story we all loved is examined (aka: skewered) with a slightly more critical view. If you think the biblical account makes sense...think again. Related: noah, noahs ark, bible, atheist, atheism, agnostic, god, jesus, genesis, church, faith, prayer, religion, cartoon Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Lec 20 | MIT 18.06 Linear Algebra, Spring 2005 Posted by: MIT
Video duration: 3061 seconds Global video hits: 42846 Lecture 20: Cramer's Rule, Inverse Matrix, and Volume. View the complete course at: ocw.mit.edu License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA More information at ocw.mit.edu More courses at ocw.mit.edu Related: matrix theory, linear algebra, systems of equations, vector spaces, determinants, eigenvalues, similarity, positive definite matrices, least-squares approximations, networks, fourier transforms, markov processes Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Big Daddy Kane - Show & Prove (DJ Premier Production) (1994) [HQ] Posted by: BeaTJunKiE82
Video duration: 351 seconds Global video hits: 18563 Producer: DJ Premier Featuring: Jay-Z, Sauce, Shyheim, Big Scoob & Ol'Dirty Bastard Released: 1994 ©: MCA Records Related: big, daddy, kane, show, prove, dj, premier, guru, gang, starr, jay-z, shyheim, oldirty, bastard, scoob, sauce, underground, rap, hip, hop, hip-hop, rare Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
| Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 |


![Big Daddy Kane - Show & Prove (DJ Premier Production) (1994) [HQ] Big Daddy Kane - Show & Prove (DJ Premier Production) (1994) [HQ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R8BZCYwQyGc/2.jpg)

Latest comments made on this video:
By: missheath000. on 25 May 12, 16:09:10
does not elevate oneself above the other. Although this? video is satirically funny, atheists watching it should be careful in how they respond to it in their interaction with people who believe in God, because it is a reflection on their character.
By: missheath000. on 25 May 12, 16:06:47
A theist looks at the facts they see and says in faith "God exists", and atheist looks at? the facts they see and says in faith, "God does not exist". An agnostic looks at the facts, sees the paradox of how there will never be enough "facts" to prove or disprove the existence of God and says, "I can not determine if God exists". This is not an attack on atheism. Atheists are not bad people, but some atheists do bad things. Same for the theists and agnostics. Mocking another person's belief system
By: missheath000. on 25 May 12, 16:00:41
Can we be wrong when interpreting scripture and can scripture be used for justifying horrible behavior? Yes it can.? All of this at the same time does not prove or disprove the existence of God. To say God does not exist takes the same level of? faith to say that he does. The only purely logical form of understanding spirituality is agnosticism.
By: missheath000. on 25 May 12, 15:54:42
However, to say that everything about the gospel is false is to miss the argumentative points of the apostles. Now Acts is a purely historical document about what Luke? saw with his journey with Paul. Acts should be taken literally as a journalistic account, the only book in the bible in which it is appropriate to do so. Again, like any journalistic piece, the author's perspective should be taken into account. You actually do pick and choose which verses are literal, but its done with good sense
By: missheath000. on 25 May 12, 15:51:53
That's not necessarily true if the particular book is studied with a literary analysis. The gospels were written like thesis. John makes a statement "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" and the rest of his work is an argument on how he believes Jesus (a real person) was a divine being. Matthew argues in his thesis about how Jesus? fulfills Jewish prophecy. Now these are facts about a real person (truth) that are being used to prove a point (subjective)
By: CainmosniMirrored. on 25 May 12, 06:46:07
If you take any? part of the bible literal you have to take ALL of it as literal. There is no picking or choosing.
By: CainmosniMirrored. on 25 May 12, 06:42:28
There is no need to try and refute claims that insects and sea life survived. The bible very CLEARLY states that? he killed everyone and everything not on the ark. Genesis 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was on the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: And Noah ONLY remained alive, and they that were WITH HIM in the ark. I'm pretty sure the fish & sea creatures missed the trip.
By: Wawagirl17. on 24 May 12, 16:31:10
"God has a thing? for arks...", I'm not sure why, but the way he says that part always makes me laugh.
By: aakesson1. on 24 May 12, 08:41:54
You can always quote Eddie Izzard: "I? will kill everything, except the floating ones and the swimming ones"
By: jimtendo420. on 23 May 12, 21:05:01
fail!!!!!! so the thousands of kids who starved to death today weren't worthy of a second chance at life?? but you were? what an ego maniac
By: moonshineinsummer1. on 23 May 12, 15:08:24
stupid bible thumpers. ?
By: ipsias. on 21 May 12, 16:34:18
so clear! and logical, reality against a fairy tale, cool!?
By: VincentandCoBxl. on 21 May 12, 16:31:56
Yum, creme brulée ? [insert Homer's drool sound here]
By: TB674. on 21 May 12, 16:29:06
It's impossible to prove? that something to prove that a invisible fantasy figure doesn't exist. But it's possible to prove whatever "facts" they said to be wrong. Like we're doing here. Derp.
By: jasssonpet. on 21 May 12, 14:04:24
What about? plants?
By: Xonipher. on 21 May 12, 11:30:25
Can? you prove unicorns don't exist?
By: krazzydrake. on 20 May 12, 20:45:39
Yep? lol!
By: 1C9J9S5. on 20 May 12, 03:32:09
"This video is showing the fallacies of a literal biblical interpretation" is the bible not supposed to be taken literally unless clearly metaphorical? and can you explain to? me how evidence is faith?
By: torrio888. on 20 May 12, 01:59:09
No atheism doesn't require any faith,atheism is simply absence? of belief i god/gods/supreme being .
By: Holliper. on 19 May 12, 18:14:08
lol?
By: matthewwalker11. on 19 May 12, 14:19:07
Why? would a crocodile need a boat? Think about it, the problem is that there is too much water....
By: missheath000. on 19 May 12, 07:43:29
Atheism seems to require just as much faith as religion.? This video is showing the fallacies of a literal biblical interpretation, but it does not prove that God does not exist. How does an atheist do this?
By: jamespiperca. on 18 May 12, 18:09:11
Love? this vid.
By: TeddyTheMoose. on 17 May 12, 02:52:12
its weird no one whos religious sees noahs ark outlandish and impossible damn it sucks to my your brain cause it will send? me to hell or so im told.